[閒聊] 女生條件跟男生一樣有優勢嗎?已回收
看板WomenTalk (女人話題)作者fatuous (fatuous)時間10年前 (2016/07/06 21:59)推噓49(59推 10噓 30→)留言99則, 62人參與討論串1/3 (看更多)
很多ptt上的討論說女方擇偶條件常看月收入
希望對方月收入比自己多…等等的人很多
但是本魯有個女性朋友 年齡20後半
長得中上 身材不錯
個性略嫌懦弱沒自信(如果要挑缺點)
月薪50k左右
國立名校碩士
文靜但是會打球(打球的時候蠻兇的,本魯是打球認識她的)
想找可以一起為未來奮鬥的對象也都找不到(連男友也沒交過)
本魯也看不出是啥問題
簡直平行世界
她薪水還ok也有上進心
不龍也不當鄉民
但據本魯所知沒人追
有車(好像還有房但不確定)
如果她是男生是不是就超搶手?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.136.239.56
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WomenTalk/M.1467813577.A.8B5.html
推
07/06 22:00, , 1F
07/06 22:00, 1F
推
07/06 22:00, , 2F
07/06 22:00, 2F
推
07/06 22:01, , 3F
07/06 22:01, 3F
→
07/06 22:01, , 4F
07/06 22:01, 4F
推
07/06 22:03, , 5F
07/06 22:03, 5F
推
07/06 22:03, , 6F
07/06 22:03, 6F
→
07/06 22:03, , 7F
07/06 22:03, 7F
推
07/06 22:03, , 8F
07/06 22:03, 8F
推
07/06 22:04, , 9F
07/06 22:04, 9F
→
07/06 22:05, , 10F
07/06 22:05, 10F
推
07/06 22:05, , 11F
07/06 22:05, 11F
推
07/06 22:05, , 12F
07/06 22:05, 12F
推
07/06 22:06, , 13F
07/06 22:06, 13F
至少認識她的時間內好像沒人追,打球也是一個人來一個人去。(請低調 偷放的 本魯只
有這張比較清楚)
※ 編輯: fatuous (114.136.239.56), 07/06/2016 22:10:27
推
07/06 22:11, , 14F
07/06 22:11, 14F
→
07/06 22:11, , 15F
07/06 22:11, 15F
推
07/06 22:12, , 16F
07/06 22:12, 16F
→
07/06 22:12, , 17F
07/06 22:12, 17F
推
07/06 22:12, , 18F
07/06 22:12, 18F
推
07/06 22:13, , 19F
07/06 22:13, 19F
推
07/06 22:13, , 20F
07/06 22:13, 20F
推
07/06 22:14, , 21F
07/06 22:14, 21F
噓
07/06 22:14, , 22F
07/06 22:14, 22F
原來是本魯標準低…
※ 編輯: fatuous (114.136.239.56), 07/06/2016 22:15:13
推
07/06 22:14, , 23F
07/06 22:14, 23F
推
07/06 22:15, , 24F
07/06 22:15, 24F
→
07/06 22:15, , 25F
07/06 22:15, 25F
推
07/06 22:15, , 26F
07/06 22:15, 26F
推
07/06 22:15, , 27F
07/06 22:15, 27F
→
07/06 22:16, , 28F
07/06 22:16, 28F
推
07/06 22:16, , 29F
07/06 22:16, 29F
推
07/06 22:16, , 30F
07/06 22:16, 30F
年初退伍XDD但至少是場上還可以看的吧!不然這看起來幾歲?
※ 編輯: fatuous (114.136.239.56), 07/06/2016 22:17:46
→
07/06 22:17, , 31F
07/06 22:17, 31F
推
07/06 22:17, , 32F
07/06 22:17, 32F
推
07/06 22:17, , 33F
07/06 22:17, 33F
推
07/06 22:18, , 34F
07/06 22:18, 34F
推
07/06 22:18, , 35F
07/06 22:18, 35F
推
07/06 22:18, , 36F
07/06 22:18, 36F
還有 26 則推文
還有 3 段內文
→
07/06 22:52, , 63F
07/06 22:52, 63F
→
07/06 22:52, , 64F
07/06 22:52, 64F
→
07/06 22:53, , 65F
07/06 22:53, 65F
→
07/06 22:54, , 66F
07/06 22:54, 66F
推
07/06 22:54, , 67F
07/06 22:54, 67F
推
07/06 22:54, , 68F
07/06 22:54, 68F
→
07/06 22:54, , 69F
07/06 22:54, 69F
→
07/06 22:55, , 70F
07/06 22:55, 70F
推
07/06 22:56, , 71F
07/06 22:56, 71F
有吧!我跟她聊的時候覺得有! 推cvbl說的,不過也是可以當作指標?
※ 編輯: fatuous (61.228.44.86), 07/06/2016 22:59:18
噓
07/06 23:04, , 72F
07/06 23:04, 72F
推
07/06 23:25, , 73F
07/06 23:25, 73F
→
07/06 23:26, , 74F
07/06 23:26, 74F
推
07/06 23:27, , 75F
07/06 23:27, 75F
這裡的球友都是已婚大叔活阿姨,不然就我這種當完兵的,她的年紀不上不下
※ 編輯: fatuous (61.228.44.86), 07/06/2016 23:31:17
推
07/06 23:34, , 76F
07/06 23:34, 76F
推
07/06 23:36, , 77F
07/06 23:36, 77F
推
07/07 00:05, , 78F
07/07 00:05, 78F
→
07/07 00:07, , 79F
07/07 00:07, 79F
推
07/07 00:07, , 80F
07/07 00:07, 80F
推
07/07 00:36, , 81F
07/07 00:36, 81F
噓
07/07 00:49, , 82F
07/07 00:49, 82F
→
07/07 00:50, , 83F
07/07 00:50, 83F
→
07/07 00:52, , 84F
07/07 00:52, 84F
→
07/07 00:53, , 85F
07/07 00:53, 85F
→
07/07 00:53, , 86F
07/07 00:53, 86F
→
07/07 00:54, , 87F
07/07 00:54, 87F
推
07/07 00:58, , 88F
07/07 00:58, 88F
推
07/07 01:43, , 89F
07/07 01:43, 89F
→
07/07 01:44, , 90F
07/07 01:44, 90F
→
07/07 01:44, , 91F
07/07 01:44, 91F
推
07/07 01:48, , 92F
07/07 01:48, 92F
推
07/07 02:07, , 93F
07/07 02:07, 93F
→
07/07 02:07, , 94F
07/07 02:07, 94F
推
07/07 07:37, , 95F
07/07 07:37, 95F
噓
07/07 08:09, , 96F
07/07 08:09, 96F
都被說顏值低,好像大概就是結論了
※ 編輯: fatuous (223.140.66.117), 07/07/2016 12:31:20
噓
07/07 13:09, , 97F
07/07 13:09, 97F
推
07/07 23:30, , 98F
07/07 23:30, 98F
→
07/07 23:30, , 99F
07/07 23:30, 99F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):
49
99
WomenTalk 近期熱門文章
PTT兩性男女區 即時熱門文章
25
37