Re: [討論] 男女版被噓爆的那篇
這種以男方原生家庭為主的的婚姻制度,已經存在很久了
自從文字發明以來就是這樣了吧,遲早要跟公婆住的,特別是需要人照顧的時候
難道你們覺得到現在2013年突然改變了嗎??
這種做法根本就是根深蒂固的存在每個男人的腦海裡
規則制度不會改變,如果女人想進入婚姻成家的話,就必須跟進
除非妳能力很強或原生家庭很有POWER,少數個案非普羅大眾,不然都得照規矩走
妳會說姐很有GUTS不信這套
不好意思這樣妳結不了婚浪費時間而已
活生生的例子原PO文者要被退婚了
(BTW她上來是想討教挽回男方的方法,完全被無視
不是被罵就是勸分我想她應該覺得滿囧的)
她這樣等於是浪費了女人人生的精華時間,不要戰什麼就算過30後還有行情之類的,
地球的男人不吃這套
就算有人會接受也是同樣沒啥行情(不高不富不帥),這點妳必須相信,郭董是續弦不算在內
每次都舉狗狗當例子好像不會膩一樣~~還有看那精美的志玲姐姐
時間根本是女人的天敵,我想這是原PO文著想試圖挽回的原因，她經不起這一道阿
妳會說再找對象阿,男人那麼多
天知道要在人海中找的一個順眼,價值觀相近,雙方父母都認可同意,床笫之事可接受
對方同時也有與妳有相同感覺,願意跟妳磨合的人有多難
有趣的是就算她又找到下個論及婚嫁的理想對象,然後再用這種態度把這套告訴那男人
一樣被退婚,直到她開竅,知道自己在婚姻中該做什麼
一堆版友在底下推什麼做不到+1
當然知道妳們做不到,但是要進入婚姻的話妳必須做,要不乾脆一個人過
再找三個志同道合的姐妹組慾望城市團
妳以為妳媽媽想孝順妳的爺爺奶奶嗎,但她必須表現出來,因為她要進入婚姻
不然妳爸不會娶她
其實稍微可以理解為什麼生小孩的時候重男輕女比較想生兒子
不是在戰能力,單純從婚姻制度切入
所謂色難,要和顏悅色的照顧男方的長輩是有點強人所難,但總要做做表面功夫吧
這個CASE的女方是連表面功夫都不做，完全沒有商量的餘地,才會被噓爆
沒什麼不好理解的
至於女方的父母,妳如果挑對男人,戲分又做足,當然我想做人女婿的也會盡一份力照顧
不至於完全不管,這點完完全全多慮了,有模糊焦點之虞,婚姻本來就互相
不要忽略這種人擇男人也是會挑的,特別是要成家,狀況外的也許就會一個人孤孤單單的歐
最後如果想扭轉這種以男方為主婚姻制度,就端看諸位姐的能力了
當所有女人的平均素質凌駕於所有男人之時,也許會改變,期待那天的到來,換換口味
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 219.81.21.34
推
09/11 01:56, , 1F
09/11 01:56, 1F
→
09/11 01:57, , 2F
09/11 01:57, 2F
推
09/11 01:58, , 3F
09/11 01:58, 3F
→
09/11 01:58, , 4F
09/11 01:58, 4F
→
09/11 01:59, , 5F
09/11 01:59, 5F
→
09/11 01:59, , 6F
09/11 01:59, 6F
→
09/11 01:59, , 7F
09/11 01:59, 7F
→
09/11 02:02, , 8F
09/11 02:02, 8F
→
09/11 02:02, , 9F
09/11 02:02, 9F
推
09/11 02:03, , 10F
09/11 02:03, 10F
推
09/11 02:04, , 11F
09/11 02:04, 11F
推
09/11 02:16, , 12F
09/11 02:16, 12F
→
09/11 02:17, , 13F
09/11 02:17, 13F
→
09/11 02:19, , 14F
09/11 02:19, 14F
推
09/11 02:22, , 15F
09/11 02:22, 15F
→
09/11 02:29, , 16F
09/11 02:29, 16F
→
09/11 02:29, , 17F
09/11 02:29, 17F
→
09/11 02:29, , 18F
09/11 02:29, 18F
→
09/11 02:30, , 19F
09/11 02:30, 19F
→
09/11 02:31, , 20F
09/11 02:31, 20F
推
09/11 02:32, , 21F
09/11 02:32, 21F
→
09/11 02:33, , 22F
09/11 02:33, 22F
推
09/11 02:41, , 23F
09/11 02:41, 23F
推
09/11 02:52, , 24F
09/11 02:52, 24F
→
09/11 02:53, , 25F
09/11 02:53, 25F
→
09/11 02:53, , 26F
09/11 02:53, 26F
→
09/11 02:54, , 27F
09/11 02:54, 27F
→
09/11 02:55, , 28F
09/11 02:55, 28F
→
09/11 02:56, , 29F
09/11 02:56, 29F
推
09/11 04:20, , 30F
09/11 04:20, 30F
→
09/11 04:21, , 31F
09/11 04:21, 31F
→
09/11 04:22, , 32F
09/11 04:22, 32F
推
09/11 04:23, , 33F
09/11 04:23, 33F
→
09/11 04:24, , 34F
09/11 04:24, 34F
→
09/11 04:25, , 35F
09/11 04:25, 35F
推
09/11 05:04, , 36F
09/11 05:04, 36F
→
09/11 07:44, , 37F
09/11 07:44, 37F
→
09/11 07:51, , 38F
09/11 07:51, 38F
→
09/11 07:52, , 39F
09/11 07:52, 39F
→
09/11 07:54, , 40F
09/11 07:54, 40F
→
09/11 07:55, , 41F
09/11 07:55, 41F
→
09/11 07:59, , 42F
09/11 07:59, 42F
→
09/11 08:00, , 43F
09/11 08:00, 43F
→
09/11 08:13, , 44F
09/11 08:13, 44F
→
09/11 08:14, , 45F
09/11 08:14, 45F
→
09/11 08:39, , 46F
09/11 08:39, 46F
→
09/11 08:40, , 47F
09/11 08:40, 47F
→
09/11 08:41, , 48F
09/11 08:41, 48F
→
09/11 08:42, , 49F
09/11 08:42, 49F
→
09/11 08:42, , 50F
09/11 08:42, 50F
推
09/11 08:43, , 51F
09/11 08:43, 51F
→
09/11 08:47, , 52F
09/11 08:47, 52F
→
09/11 08:48, , 53F
09/11 08:48, 53F
→
09/11 09:20, , 54F
09/11 09:20, 54F
→
09/11 09:21, , 55F
09/11 09:21, 55F
→
09/11 09:27, , 56F
09/11 09:27, 56F
推
09/11 10:26, , 57F
09/11 10:26, 57F
→
09/11 10:27, , 58F
09/11 10:27, 58F
噓
09/11 10:40, , 59F
09/11 10:40, 59F
→
09/11 10:45, , 60F
09/11 10:45, 60F
→
09/11 10:46, , 61F
09/11 10:46, 61F
→
09/11 10:46, , 62F
09/11 10:46, 62F
推
09/11 11:09, , 63F
09/11 11:09, 63F
→
09/11 11:11, , 64F
09/11 11:11, 64F
→
09/11 11:12, , 65F
09/11 11:12, 65F
推
09/11 11:14, , 66F
09/11 11:14, 66F
→
09/11 11:48, , 67F
09/11 11:48, 67F
推
09/11 12:19, , 68F
09/11 12:19, 68F
推
09/11 12:31, , 69F
09/11 12:31, 69F
推
09/11 12:37, , 70F
09/11 12:37, 70F
→
09/11 13:36, , 71F
09/11 13:36, 71F
→
09/11 13:37, , 72F
09/11 13:37, 72F
→
09/11 13:37, , 73F
09/11 13:37, 73F
→
09/11 13:39, , 74F
09/11 13:39, 74F
→
09/11 13:40, , 75F
09/11 13:40, 75F
噓
09/11 16:43, , 76F
09/11 16:43, 76F
推
09/11 17:28, , 77F
09/11 17:28, 77F
推
09/11 18:06, , 78F
09/11 18:06, 78F
討論串 (同標題文章)
WomenTalk 近期熱門文章
PTT兩性男女區 即時熱門文章
24
28
7
14