[臺大演講] Towards a Feminist Interpretive …

看板Feminism (女性主義)作者時間13年前 (2011/03/29 16:42), 編輯推噓2(206)
留言8則, 3人參與, 最新討論串1/1
┌┐ ˙ ┌──┐ ││────────────˙─────────────────┐ │╔═╪╗ ██ 【臺大社會系 學術演講系列】│║˙│║ ██ ˙ FB演講訊息 http://goo.gl/FSMxB └╫─┘║ ██ │ | ║ ║ 講題: Towards a Feminist Interpretive Sociology of Sexuality │ ∣ ╚══╝ │ ∣ 講者: Stevi Jackson    ┌─┐˙ 英國約克大學婦女研究中心主任 ─┘ ∣ │ ∣ 主持: 吳嘉苓 ┌──┐ ┌──┐ 臺灣大學社會學系副教授 │ ╔╪═╗└──└─╫┘ ║│ ∣ ˙ ═╝│ ∣ 時間: 2011年04月14日 (星期四) 中午12:30-14:00 ┌─┐ │ ∣ 地點: 臺大社會學系館401會議室 │ │ ╔═╗ ˙ ┌┐ └─┘ ██ └───────────────────────── ││ ║ ║ ██ ˙ ╚═╝ . ══ .════════ ※ 講者簡介 ═════════════ Stevi Jackson gained her BA in Sociology from the University of Kent in 1972 and her Masters from the University of York in 1973, after which she returned to Kent to pursue doctoral research on young women and sexuality. She has retained her interest in sexuality throughout her career, but has also worked on broader aspects of feminist theory, on family relationships and on childhood. In recent years she has begun to develop collaborative relationships with Asian scholars and an interest in comparative work on gender, sexuality and social change. ══ .════════ ※ 演講簡介 ═════════════ This paper is based on my recent co-authored book, Theorizing Sexuality (Open University Press 2010) in which we argue for recovering the radical insights of the pragmatist/interactionist tradition and to establish its continued relevance to a distinctively sociological and feminist analysis of sexuality. The interactionist approach to sexuality, pioneered by John Gagnon and William Simon, was the first to offer a fully social understanding of sexuality, but was subsequently eclipsed by Foucauldian and queer approaches - yet it has distinct advantages for both feminist and sociological analysis. As I will argue in this paper, this approach is enables us to take account of multiple facets of social life, addresses the actualities of everyday social practices, is flexible enough to encompass cultural differences and social change and is therefore ideally suited to grappling with the complexities of contemporary sexual life in global late modernity. . ★ ☆ . ════ ˙ ════ ‧ ══════ ══ ˙ . ☆ ★ ☆ *演講機會難得,另現場前30名有免費小點心,歡迎踴躍參與~ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.112.120.116 ※ 編輯: nakts0123 來自: 59.112.120.116 (03/29 16:40) ※ 編輯: nakts0123 來自: 59.112.120.116 (03/29 16:41) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.112.120.116 ※ 編輯: nakts0123 來自: 59.112.120.116 (03/29 16:41) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.112.120.116 ※ 編輯: nakts0123 來自: 59.112.120.116 (03/29 16:42) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.112.120.116 ※ 編輯: nakts0123 來自: 59.112.120.116 (03/29 16:42) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.112.120.116 ※ 編輯: nakts0123 來自: 59.112.120.116 (03/29 16:43)

03/29 19:04, , 1F
推一下Stevi Jackson
03/29 19:04, 1F

03/31 15:34, , 2F
其實很不喜歡明明是來台灣演講,連個簡介也擺英文。
03/31 15:34, 2F

03/31 15:35, , 3F
到底有沒有想要台灣人去聽演講呢?
03/31 15:35, 3F

04/02 11:56, , 4F
(離題)1.如果演講者演講時是說英文,而且沒有中文即時口譯,
04/02 11:56, 4F

04/02 11:57, , 5F
那麼簡介用英文似無不妥。2.當然,我不知道此次演講是否符合
04/02 11:57, 5F

04/02 11:57, , 6F
上面兩個條件。3.即使此次演講符合上面兩個條件,樓上t君還
04/02 11:57, 6F

04/02 11:57, , 7F
是可以質問「到底有沒有想要台灣人去聽演講」,但這就和「簡
04/02 11:57, 7F

04/02 11:57, , 8F
介是英文」無關了。
04/02 11:57, 8F
文章代碼(AID): #1DaPk7c4 (Feminism)
文章代碼(AID): #1DaPk7c4 (Feminism)